The disorders
room had, as usual, been suffered to exist
nothing beyond what
stated
"Gazette des Tribunaux
" Dupin scrutinized every thing - not excepting the bodies
victims
We then went
other rooms, and
yard;
gendarme accompanying us throughout
The examination occupied us until dark, when we took our departure
way home my companion stepped in for
moment
office of
daily papers

said
whims
friend were manifold,
Je les mnagais_: -
phrase
no English equivalent
his humor, now, to decline all conversation
murder, until about noon the
He then asked me, suddenly, if I had observed any thing peculiar
scene
atrocity

something
manner of emphasizing the word "peculiar," which caused me to shudder, without knowing why

"No, nothing peculiar_,"
; "nothing more,
, than we both saw stated
paper
"
"The 'Gazette,' " he replied, "
entered,
,
unusual horror
thing
But dismiss the idle opinions
print
It appears
mystery is considered insoluble,
very reason which should cause it
regarded as easy of solution - I mean
outr character
features
The police are confounded
seeming absence of motive - not
murder itself - but
atrocity
murder
puzzled, too,
seeming impossibility of reconciling the voices heard in contention,
facts that no one was discovered up stairs but the assassinated Mademoiselle L'Espanaye,
there were no means of egress without the notice
party ascending
The wild disorder
room; the corpse thrust,
head downward, up the chimney; the frightful mutilation
body
old lady; these considerations, with those just mentioned, and others which
not mention, have sufficed to paralyze the powers, by putting completely at fault the boasted acumen_,
government agents
fallen
gross but common error of confounding the unusual
abstruse
But
deviations
plane
ordinary, that reason feels its way, if at all, in its search
true
In investigations such
now pursuing, it
asked 'what has occurred,' as 'what has occurred that has never occurred before
'
, the facility
arrive, or have arrived,
solution
mystery, is
direct ratio
apparent insolubility
eyes
police
"
I stared
speaker in mute astonishment

"
now awaiting," continued he, looking toward the door
apartment - "
now awaiting
person who, although perhaps not the perpetrator
butcheries, must
in some measure implicated in their perpetration
worst portion
crimes committed,
probable that
innocent
right
supposition; for upon it I build my expectation of reading the entire riddle
I look
man here -
room - every moment
true that
not arrive; but the probability
Should he come,
necessary to detain him
Here are pistols; and we both know how to use them when occasion demands their use
"
the pistols, scarcely knowing what
, or believing what I heard, while Dupin went on,
in
soliloquy
already spoken
abstract manner at such times
His discourse was addressed to myself; but his voice, although by no means loud, had that intonation
commonly employed in speaking to some one at
great distance
His eyes, vacant in expression, regarded only the wall

"
voices heard in contention,"
, "
party
stairs,
the voices
women themselves, was fully proved
evidence
This relieves us of all doubt
question whether the old lady
first destroyed the daughter and afterward have committed suicide
I speak
point chiefly
sake of method;
strength of Madame L'Espanaye
utterly unequal
task of thrusting her daughter's corpse up the chimney as
found;
nature
wounds upon her own person entirely preclude the idea of self-destruction
Murder, then,
committed by some third party;
voices
third party were those heard in contention
Let me now advert - not
whole testimony respecting these voices - but to
peculiar
testimony
Did you observe any thing peculiar
? "
I remarked that, while all the witnesses agreed in supposing the gruff voice
that of
Frenchman,
much disagreement in regard
shrill, or, as one individual termed it, the harsh voice

"That
evidence itself," said Dupin, "but
not the peculiarity
evidence
observed nothing distinctive
Yet
something
observed
The witnesses,
remark, agreed
gruff voice; they were here unanimous
But in regard
shrill voice, the peculiarity is - not
disagreed - but that, while an Italian, an Englishman,
Spaniard,
Hollander, and
Frenchman attempted to describe it,
spoke of it
of
foreigner
Each is sure
not the voice of one
own countrymen
Each likens it - not
voice of an individual of any nation with whose language
conversant - but the converse
The Frenchman supposes it the voice of
Spaniard, and '
distinguished some words had he been acquainted
Spanish
' The Dutchman maintains it
that of
Frenchman; but
it stated that '_not understanding French this witness was examined through an interpreter
' The Englishman thinks it the voice of
German, and '_does not understand German
' The Spaniard 'is sure'
that of an Englishman, but 'judges
intonation' altogether, '_as he has no knowledge
English
' The Italian believes it the voice of
Russian, but '_has never conversed with
native of Russia
'
second Frenchman differs, moreover,
first,
positive
voice
of an Italian; but, not being cognizant
tongue_, is, like the Spaniard, 'convinced
intonation
' Now, how strangely unusual must that voice have really been,
such testimony
elicited ! - in whose tones_, even, denizens
five great divisions of Europe could recognise nothing familiar !
say
the voice of an Asiatic - of an African
Neither Asiatics nor Africans abound in Paris; but, without denying the inference,
now merely call your attention to three points
The voice is termed by one witness 'harsh rather than shrill
'
represented by two others
'quick and unequal
' No words - no sounds resembling words - were by any witness mentioned as distinguishable

"
not," continued Dupin, "what impression
made,
, upon your own understanding; but
hesitate
that legitimate deductions even
portion
testimony - the portion respecting the gruff and shrill voices - are in themselves sufficient to engender
suspicion which should give direction to all farther progress
investigation
mystery
'legitimate deductions;' but my meaning
thus fully expressed
I designed to imply
deductions are the sole proper ones, and
suspicion arises inevitably
single result
What the suspicion is, however,
say just yet
I merely wish you to bear in mind that, with myself,
sufficiently forcible
definite form -
certain tendency - to my inquiries
chamber

"
now transport ourselves, in fancy,
chamber
What shall we first seek here ? The means of egress employed
murderers
that neither of us believe in prternatural events
Madame and Mademoiselle L'Espanaye
destroyed by spirits
The doers
deed were material, and escaped materially
Then how ? Fortunately,
but one mode of reasoning
point,
mode must lead us to
definite decision
-
examine, each by each, the possible means of egress
clear
assassins were
room where Mademoiselle L'Espanaye was found, or
room adjoining,
party ascended the stairs
then only
two apartments that
to seek issues
The police have laid bare the floors, the ceilings,
masonry
walls, in every direction
No secret issues