One part
hem
frock and it
mended
They looked like strips torn off
' Here, inadvertently, Le Soleil has employed an exceedingly suspicious phrase
The pieces, as described, do indeed 'look like strips torn off;' but purposely and by hand
rarest of accidents that
piece is 'torn off,' from any garment such as is now
,
agency of
thorn
very nature
fabrics,
thorn or nail becoming entangled
, tears them rectangularly - divides them into two longitudinal rents, at right angles with
, and meeting at an apex where the thorn enters - but
scarcely possible to conceive the piece 'torn off
' I never so knew it, nor did you
To tear
piece off from such fabric, two distinct forces, in different directions,
, in almost every case, required
If there be two edges
fabric - if, for example, it be
pocket- handkerchief, and
desired to tear
slip, then, and then only, will the one force serve the purpose
But
present case the question is of
dress, presenting but one edge
To tear
piece
interior, where no edge is presented, could only be effected by
miracle
agency of thorns, and no one thorn could accomplish it
But, even where an edge is presented, two thorns
necessary, operating, the one in two distinct directions,
other in one
And this
supposition
edge is unhemmed
If hemmed, the matter is nearly
We thus see the numerous and great obstacles
way of pieces being 'torn off'
simple agency of 'thorns;' yet
required
that one piece but that many
so torn
'And one part,' too, '
hem
frock ! ' Another piece was 'part
skirt, not the hem,' -
, was torn completely out
agency of thorns,
uncaged interior
dress ! These,
, are things which one may well be pardoned for disbelieving; yet, taken collectedly, they form, perhaps, less of reasonable ground for suspicion,
one startling circumstance
articles' having been left
thicket at all, by any murderers who had enough precaution
of removing the corpse
apprehended me rightly, however,
suppose it my design to deny this thicket
scene
outrage
There
wrong here, or, more possibly, an accident at Madame Deluc's
But,
,
point of minor importance
engaged in an attempt to discover the scene, but
the perpetrators
murder
What
adduced, notwithstanding the minuteness
adduced it,
view, first, to show the folly
positive and headlong assertions of Le Soleil, but secondly and chiefly, to bring you,
most natural route, to
further contemplation
doubt whether this assassination has, or
, the work of
gang

"
resume this question by mere allusion
revolting details
surgeon examined
inquest
only necessary
published inferences, in regard
number of ruffians,
properly ridiculed as unjust and totally baseless, by all the reputable anatomists of Paris
Not
matter
as inferred, but that
no ground
inference: - was there not much for another ?
"
reflect now upon 'the traces of
struggle;' and let me ask what these traces
supposed to demonstrate

gang
But do they not rather demonstrate the absence of
gang ? What struggle
taken place - what struggle so violent and so enduring as
left its 'traces' in all directions - between
weak and defenceless girl
gang of ruffians imagined ? The silent grasp of
few rough arms and all
over
The victim must
absolutely passive at their will
here bear in mind
arguments urged against the thicket
scene, are applicable in chief part, only against it
scene of an outrage committed by more than
single individual
imagine but one violator,
conceive, and thus only conceive, the struggle of so violent and so obstinate
nature as
left the 'traces' apparent

"And again
already mentioned the suspicion
excited
fact
articles
were suffered to remain at all
thicket where discovered
It seems almost impossible
evidences of guilt
accidentally left where found
sufficient presence of mind (
supposed) to remove the corpse; and yet
more positive evidence
corpse itself (whose features
quickly obliterated by decay,) is allowed to lie conspicuously
scene
outrage - I allude
handkerchief
name
deceased
If
accident,
not the accident of
gang
imagine it only the accident of an individual
An individual has committed the murder
alone
ghost
departed
appalled by what lies motionless before him
The fury
passion is over, and
abundant room
heart
natural awe
deed
His is none
confidence which the presence of numbers inevitably inspires
alone
dead
He trembles
bewildered
Yet
necessity for disposing
corpse
He bears it
river, but leaves behind him the other evidences of guilt;
is difficult,
impossible to carry all the burthen at once, and
easy to return for
left
But
toilsome journey
water his fears redouble within him
The sounds of life encompass his path

dozen times he hears or fancies the step of an observer
Even the very lights
city bewilder him
Yet,
and by long and frequent pauses of deep agony, he reaches the river's brink, and disposes
ghastly charge - perhaps
medium of
boat
But now what treasure does the world hold - what threat of vengeance could it hold out - which
power to urge the return
lonely murderer over that toilsome and perilous path,
thicket and its blood chilling recollections ? He returns not, let the consequences be what
return if
His sole thought is immediate escape
He turns his back forever upon those dreadful shrubberies and flees as
wrath

"But how with
gang ? Their number
inspired them with confidence; if, indeed confidence is ever wanting
breast
arrant blackguard; and of arrant blackguards alone are the supposed gangs ever constituted
Their number,
,
prevented the bewildering and unreasoning terror which
imagined to paralyze the single man
Could we suppose an oversight in one, or two, or three, this oversight
remedied by
fourth
left nothing behind them; for their number
enabled them to carry all at once
There
no need of return

"Consider now the circumstance that
outer garment
corpse when found, 'a slip, about
foot wide
torn upward
bottom hem
waist wound three times round the waist, and secured by
sort of hitch
back
' This
obvious design of affording
handle
to carry the body
But would any number of men have dreamed of resorting to such an expedient ? To three or four, the limbs
corpse
afforded
sufficient, but the best possible hold
The device
of
single individual; and this brings us
fact that '
thicket
river, the rails
fences were found taken down,
ground bore evident traces of some heavy burden having been dragged along it ! ' But would
number of men have put themselves
superfluous trouble of taking down
fence,
of dragging through it
corpse which they
lifted over any fence in an instant ? Would
number of men have so dragged
corpse at all as
left evident traces
dragging ?
"And here
refer to an observation of Le Commerciel; an observation
already, in some measure, commented
'A piece,' says this journal, 'of
unfortunate girl's petticoats was torn out and tied under her chin, and around the back of her head, probably
screams
This
by fellows who had no pocket-handkerchiefs
'
"
before suggested that
genuine blackguard is never without
pocket-handkerchief
But
fact that I now especially advert
not through want of
handkerchief
imagined by Le Commerciel,
bandage was employed, is rendered apparent
handkerchief left
thicket; and
object was not '
screams' appears, also,
bandage having been employed in preference to what would
better have answered the purpose
But the language
evidence speaks
strip
as 'found around the neck, fitting loosely, and secured with
hard knot