allowing
great deal,) there certainly must
some one
thought it worth while
over and attend the investigation,
thought the body
of Marie
Nobody went over
nothing said or heard
Rue Pave St
Andre, that reached even the occupants
same building
M
St
Eustache, the lover and intended husband of Marie, who boarded in her mother's house, deposes that
hear
discovery
body
intended until the next morning, when M
Beauvais came into his chamber and told him of it
For an item of news like this, it strikes us
very coolly received
"
the journal endeavored to create the impression of an apathy
relatives of Marie, inconsistent
supposition
relatives believed the corpse
hers
Its insinuations amount
: - that Marie,
connivance of her friends, had absented herself
city for reasons involving
charge against her chastity; and
friends,
discovery of
corpse
Seine, somewhat resembling that
girl, had availed themselves
opportunity to impress press the public
belief of her death
But L'Etoile was again over-hasty
distinctly proved that no apathy, such as was imagined, existed;
old lady was exceedingly feeble, and so agitated
be unable to attend to any duty, that St
Eustache,
from receiving the news coolly, was distracted with grief, and bore himself so frantically, that M
Beauvais prevailed upon
friend and relative
charge of him, and prevent his attending the examination
disinterment
Moreover, although
stated by L'Etoile,
corpse was re-interred
public expense - that an advantageous offer of private sculpture was absolutely declined
family -
no member
family attended the ceremonial: - although,
, all
asserted by L'Etoile in furtherance
impression it designed to convey - yet all
satisfactorily disproved
In
subsequent number
paper, an attempt
to throw suspicion upon Beauvais himself
The editor says:
"Now, then,
change comes over the matter
told that on one occasion, while
Madame B---- was at Madame Rogt's house, M
Beauvais, who was going out, told her that
gendarme was expected there, and she, Madame B
, must not say anything
gendarme until he returned, but let the matter be for him
.
.
present posture of affairs, M
Beauvais appears
the whole matter looked up
head

single step
taken without M
Beauvais; for, go
, you run against him
.
. For some reason, he determined that nobody
any thing
proceedings but himself, and he has elbowed the male relatives
way, according
representations, in
very singular manner
He seems
averse to permitting the relatives
the body
"
following fact, some color was given
suspicion thus thrown upon Beauvais

visiter at his office,
prior
girl's disappearance, and during the absence
occupant, had observed
rose
key-hole
door,
name "Marie" inscribed upon
slate which hung near at hand

The general impression,
were enabled to glean it
newspapers, seemed
, that Marie
the victim of
gang of desperadoes - that
she
borne across the river, maltreated and murdered
Le Commerciel, {*11} however,
print of extensive influence, was earnest in combating this popular idea
I quote
passage or two from its columns:
"
persuaded that pursuit has hitherto been on
false scent,
directed
Barrire du Roule
impossible that
person
known to thousands
young woman was,
passed three blocks without some one having seen her; and
who saw her
remembered it, for she interested all who knew her
streets were full of people, when she went out
.
.
impossible that she
gone
Barrire du Roule, or
Rue des Drmes, without being recognized by
dozen persons; yet no one
forward who saw her outside of her mother's door, and
no evidence, except the testimony concerning her expressed intentions, that she did go out at all
Her gown was torn, bound round her, and tied; and by
body was carried as
bundle
murder
committed
Barrire du Roule, there
no necessity for any such arrangement
The fact
body was found floating near the Barrire, is no proof
where
thrown
water
.
.

piece of
unfortunate girl's petticoats, two feet long and one foot wide, was torn out and tied under her chin around the back of her head, probably
screams
This
by fellows who had no pocket-handkerchief
"
Prefect called upon us, however, some important information reached the police, which seemed to overthrow,
, the chief portion of Le Commerciel's argument
Two small boys, sons of
Madame Deluc, while roaming
woods near the Barrire du Roule, chanced to penetrate
close thicket, within which were three or four large stones, forming
kind of seat, with
back and footstool
upper stone lay
white petticoat;
second
silk scarf

parasol, gloves, and
pocket-handkerchief were also here found
The handkerchief bore the name "Marie Rogt
" Fragments of dress were discovered
brambles around
The earth was trampled, the bushes were broken, and
every evidence of
struggle
thicket
river, the fences were found taken down,
ground bore evidence of some heavy burthen having been dragged along it

weekly paper, Le Soleil,{*12} had the following comments
discovery -- comments which merely echoed the sentiment
whole Parisian press:
"The things had all evidently been there
three or four weeks; they were all mildewed down hard
action
rain and stuck together from mildew
The grass had grown around and over
The silk
parasol was strong, but the threads of it were run together within
The upper part, where it
doubled and folded, was all mildewed and rotten, and tore on its being opened
.
.
The pieces of her frock torn out
bushes were about three inches wide and six inches long
One part
hem
frock, and it
mended; the other piece was part
skirt, not the hem
They looked like strips torn off, and were
thorn bush, about
foot
ground
.
.
There
, therefore,
spot
appalling outrage
discovered
"
Consequent
discovery, new evidence appeared
Madame Deluc testified that she keeps
roadside inn not far
bank
river, opposite the Barrire du Roule
The neighborhood is secluded -- particularly so
usual Sunday resort of blackguards
city, who cross the river in boats
About three o'clock,
afternoon
Sunday
,
young girl arrived
inn, accompanied by
young man of dark complexion
The two remained here for
On their departure, they took the road to some thick woods
vicinity
Madame Deluc's attention was called
dress worn
girl, on account
resemblance to one worn by
deceased relative

scarf was particularly noticed
Soon
departure
couple,
gang of miscreants made their appearance, behaved boisterously, ate and drank without making payment, followed
route
young man and girl, returned
inn about dusk, and re-crossed the river
in great haste

soon after dark,
same evening, that Madame Deluc,
as her eldest son, heard the screams of
female
vicinity
inn
The screams were violent but brief
Madame D
recognized
the scarf
found
thicket, but the dress
discovered
corpse
An omnibus driver, Valence, {*13} now also testified that
Marie Rogt cross
ferry
Seine,
Sunday
, in company with
young man of dark complexion
He, Valence, knew Marie, and
mistaken in her identity
The articles found
thicket were fully identified
relatives of Marie

The items of evidence and information thus collected
,
newspapers,
suggestion of Dupin, embraced
more point -- but
point of seemingly vast consequence
It appears that, immediately
discovery
clothes as above described, the lifeless, or nearly lifeless body of St